Comments on: Kiwi Man Bans All Citizens of Lower Hutt From Motel (Video)

By: Kate

Kate — Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:48:30 +0000

I think that such an expressive ban can spoil the reputation of this motel. .-= Kate´s last blog ..ORM Propel 1.5 is out =-.

By: Michael@Christchurch Motel

Michael@Christchurch Motel — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:53:39 +0000

We are into the motels gig and we understand the problem better. Often youngsters create problem and the pose to jeopardize the families weekend or vacation. We have encountered several situations like that and we did the same to make sure the couples/families are safe and get what they want. Only because of certain irresponsible youths these problems occur.

By: Aft

Aft — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:40:12 +0000

Oh it is his motel and if roudy sports teams disturb his guests then it could eventually affect his business. So I think he has done the right thing in the interest of his business and the people staying at the motel.

By: kiwibloke

kiwibloke — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:42:20 +0000

True it is Wainuiomata, Lower Hutt is used for convenience for our overseas friends.

By: Pri

Pri — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:15:24 +0000

I just want to clarify that it’s Wainuiomata that the motel has banned, not Lower Hutt. Wainui is a suburb of Lower Hutt.

By: kiwibloke

kiwibloke — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:38:27 +0000

@james: I agree the guy is well within his rights to ban people. I think the issue was that it was a blanket ban of Lower Hutt, rather than say banning just sports teams in his motel.

By: james

james — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:29:25 +0000

If people from lower hut tend to be rowdy and cause disruption to the motel owner then he has every reason to create a ban. I am sick of people like that ruining our country, its unbeleivable the amount of people that think they are owed something from society when they are such disruptions to us!